InvestorsHub Logo

goodplenty100

02/26/16 1:20 PM

#255003 RE: senrex #254995

Perhaps not senrex

Only one man's comment who does not fully understand what we all do here.

What said is said. The fact that this was overlooked yesterday brings a different meaning today..The piece was in the works and I just wanted to bring it to the boards attention. We are only in a position to rise at this junction regardless of what was written.

stoneroad

02/26/16 1:21 PM

#255004 RE: senrex #254995

If what this guy claims is true, why in the world would Wolchok and MSK work with Bavi and PPHM?

onco

02/26/16 1:30 PM

#255007 RE: senrex #254995

No way is any of it true, very unlikely med Onc Never met one that poorly educated and crass

wwtmm

02/26/16 1:51 PM

#255019 RE: senrex #254995

This looks like someone who was involved in another stock I owned. If so pay no attention.

nh

02/26/16 2:27 PM

#255036 RE: senrex #254995

Did you see this post as well?

Dr. NH BS, MD, PhD says:
February 25, 2016 at 9:04 pm

Grasshopper, be patient. This is good science. Did you see Dr. Birge's, et. al. article this morning? 2-26-16: “Phosphatidylserine is a Global Immunosuppressive Signal in Efferocytosis, Infectious Disease, and Cancer”
'Cell Death & Differentiation Jrnl' online pub. 2-26-16 (rec.10-31-15; acc.1-7-16). The market just doesn't understand phosphatidylserine (yet). Wook it up, Peregrine falcon, wook it up!

north40000

02/26/16 3:53 PM

#255066 RE: senrex #254995

"...my onc colleagues...just don't understand..." PS.

Some do, some don't.