Such a repetitive question. I suggest reading old comments for answers. This debate has been played out. You either believe the company started over 3 years ago with new management or you ignore that and include the entire 20 year history. That's really the bottom line.
The last 3 years have been solid for an R&D company with a disruptive product that requires extensive testing and industry acceptance to go to market. Current mgmt is either telling the truth or lying. The progress made and info provided leads me to believe they are working hard and smart. I'll keep waiting until they give us reason to not believe them anymore.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
