InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MONQUE2

02/22/16 8:21 AM

#12257 RE: WealthWithoutGreed #12248

You're absolutely right. We've discussed it before on this board, Prostar could have merged with a shell corporation somewhere. Doing it much cheaper and in a much more advantageous way (to Mr Zaric). So, there was a reason they merged with HPTG.

Imo, I believe going forward, the driver for the Hydroplant is emissions, especially Particulate Matter. PM reduction is being pushed hard in the EU and other emerging countries. The older diesels, on land and air, are the main offenders. The Hydroplant would be the cheapest solution for corporations and governmental agencies (transport). I truly believe over time, the market comes to us for a solution to those issues. Additionally, regardless of the cost of diesel, it's still a benefit when you can save some money based on improved fuel economy. It just wouldn't be a primary driver for the purchase of a Hydroplant while diesel fuel is inexpensive (relatively speaking).

Like a lot of investors here, I just prefer to think of the Hydroplant as being in the company's back pocket and focus on the trucking aspect of the corporation for right now.
icon url

MONQUE2

02/22/16 8:23 AM

#12258 RE: WealthWithoutGreed #12248

You're absolutely right. We've discussed it before on this board, Prostar could have merged with a shell corporation somewhere. Doing it much cheaper and in a much more advantageous way (to Mr Zaric). So, there was a reason they merged with HPTG.

Imo, I believe going forward, the driver for the Hydroplant is emissions, especially Particulate Matter. PM reduction is being pushed hard in the EU and other emerging countries. The older diesels, on land and air, are the main offenders. The Hydroplant would be the cheapest solution for corporations and governmental agencies (transport). I truly believe over time, the market comes to us for a solution to those issues. Additionally, regardless of the cost of diesel, it's still a benefit when you can save some money based on improved fuel economy. It just wouldn't be a primary driver for the purchase of a Hydroplant while diesel fuel is inexpensive (relatively speaking).

Like a lot of investors here, I just prefer to think of the Hydroplant as being in the company's back pocket and focus on the trucking aspect of the corporation for right now.