InvestorsHub Logo

F6

02/20/16 6:27 PM

#244991 RE: fuagf #244989

fuagf -- I'll continue to wait to see if Nate is displaying any particular insight this time around (haven't seen any such yet)

strikes me as quite odd, and to put it mildly less than entirely consistent with he would and wouldn't say last time around, that he would even reach to make that sort of a highly speculative and tendentious statement now -- perhaps he's finding it tough to stand out as some unique sage as we head ever deeper into what must be a big earning time for he who was too big for the NYT -- . . .