InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Scouser2

02/20/16 1:54 PM

#329701 RE: big-yank #329699

But that´s just it big-yank, you don´t provide any productive discussion with fellow shareholders, you just wind them up with your misinformed quotes and half truths and annoy them!
You´ve met your match many a time on this board and you´re meeting it again with obiterdictum, "Hail Caesar".
Don´t mess with the best,cos the best don´t mess!
Enjoy your weekend.
icon url

Mikey Mike

02/20/16 1:59 PM

#329702 RE: big-yank #329699

So, don't hand me no lies and just keep your thoughts to yourself...

icon url

obiterdictum

02/20/16 2:13 PM

#329707 RE: big-yank #329699

I don't have a law clerk. So let's just say its my opinion after reading this and many other published accounts from multiple sources and paraphrased into my words. No reply necessary. Sorry I wasted both my time and yours hoping for some productive discussion that might benefit shareholders, including me as a substantial investor in FNMA preferred.

A law clerk is not needed to read through 5 pages of text.

Simply, copy and paste the text in the brief (or other briefs) that was used to produce this paraphrasing:. "The defense alternatively points out that the novelty of their contributing one of the largest monetary bailouts in history imposes a unique, additional element to the agreement between Fannie Mae and the government, one that justifies barring of future derivative suits."

Then, support for the statement made can be had by all.

http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Jacobs_Hindes/15-00708-0027.pdf