Replies to post #329349 on Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[gta888]

"In even more plain language, the argument is: This application ain't right. There is no reason to do this, you have no right to to do this, it is unnecessary to do this. Why? Because we says so. We have the legal authority and power on our side and the Plaintiffs do not know what they are talking about. So, don't do it.
"

Great translation Obi...fell of my chair laughing

[cfljmljfl]

Thank you obi for demonstrating the gov false circular arguement " it is so cause I say it is so" . Next step judge moves request to state courts for certify approval. Have a nice dinner this venting.

[Blushing green]

Thanks for the reply.

[mikoli007]

Ok, so I've read the supremacy clause and article vi and it seems to me that put in it's proper context that is, it only applies if the Government is exercising their constitutionally authorized powers or operating within the constitution. They have to be consistent with the constitution, they can't just make up stuff outside of the constitution and declare we are the supreme law. If that were the case they could do whatever, whenever they wanted and we would have no need for the rest of the constitution.

[HappyAlways]

Great job and thanks.