Replies to post #144075 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[VeeCee]

Question is why this guy keeps on promoting TSMC superiority and down playing Intel's claim. Is he paid by TSMC like the other guy?
TCE writes a few blogs every day criticising or explaining Intel's technology when he is not an expert on process technology. Most of his blogs over the last a few months are cut and paste of his own blogs. Nothing new in my mind.

[Andy Grave]

well....although Asraf often avoids answering my posts....it's clear he reads them......religiously........Say Hallelujah......Say Amen

In particular, the question that he asks is essentially: Why didn't Intel disclose both transistor count and die size for its low-power Cherryview (Atom) system-on-chip, which is aimed at just about the same power target as the Apple A9/A9X? The compositions in this case should be more comparable.

The fact that Intel hasn't disclosed transistor counts for either its 22-nanometer or 14-nanometer Atom processors certainly serves as a potential yellow flag with respect to Intel's claims of cost-per-transistor superiority. " http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/02/15/do-intel-corps-cost-per-transistor-claims-hold-up.aspx</i>;