I don't have time to find links, but, I highly doubt they'd lie to the court. There must be a reason for the acquisition dates being the same.
Best guess would have something to do with the merger or acquisition in 2008 requiring a transfer of shares between transfer agents. The shell started out as Econo...something or another. I don't know the full history, but, I don't see them lying to the court. And, whatever the case, it's obvious that those two were well aware of Cellceutix if they held shares.