InvestorsHub Logo

StrikeWilliams

02/06/16 9:38 PM

#270494 RE: bryceharper90 #270491

you don't have ANY evidence to support what you say. at all. conspiracy is almost as bad as some of the predictions around here.

JToews19

02/06/16 10:14 PM

#270495 RE: bryceharper90 #270491

That's your theory according to what Vanis said. Same guy who's said quite a lot things. Another theory is they started scaling it down because they were running out of money, hence the reverse split and the reported $281 they had on the last Q. Then pretty much they offered what they did for the brand and it was take that or it goes back to being a useless concept no one is pushing. If it was some negotiation tactic over a great opportunity, that emerged, they wouldn't have given up that much, as the brand would be MORE valuable.

Whatever theory there is for what happened, how come so little has been done for the brand in the 4 months they've now fully owned it???

2obee1

02/06/16 10:51 PM

#270496 RE: bryceharper90 #270491

Bryce,

I am not going to say that your theory doesn't have merit, as that is what Vanis has led us to believe, but that doesn't sit right with me.. I am not buying it, this is a penny stock CEO after all..

JT's explanation makes perfect sense.. It is very curious why Vanis isn't pushing Fizz at all the past few months... I asked last night, why sit around and do nothing while waiting on some national account? Doesn't make sense, and might have a lot to do with having no money..

It is apparent that they had to R/S so they had some working capital.. I mean, he's already doubled the OS from 35 million to 60 million in a matter of months...

We will find out whose theory is closest to the truth soon.. I hope..





Fizzman

02/07/16 1:55 AM

#270501 RE: bryceharper90 #270491

Believe what you may..... It's now 7 months later and still no National account!!! WOW!