InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CuresForHumanity

02/04/16 9:51 PM

#252015 RE: Krakonos #252014

Krak, I was referring to the 5 vs 5 months in the unhealthy arms- no difference. In the healthier groups 12 vs 17 months HUGE difference. Glad you are posting :-)
icon url

eb0783

02/04/16 11:46 PM

#252033 RE: Krakonos #252014

Krak, I appreciate what you trying to say but I disagree with:

CuresForHumanity, would it not apply to any drug?


because, until recently, drugs targeted the cancer/virus. It had not much to do with the immune system and, in fact many of yesterday's therapies destroyed the immune system. Today, we are talking about immuno therapy (cancer, virus, parasite, bacteria, etc., etc.). YES, for the immune system to kill the attacker, it needs to be viable. The previous drugs had NO concern for the immune system. AND that is why YOU are NOT depending on drugs that attack the cancer but you are doing things to help your body (immune system) fight off the invader.

Keep on fighting, buddy. Keep on posting
icon url

Protector

02/05/16 8:08 AM

#252052 RE: Krakonos #252014

Krakonos, yes Bavi would work better on low ECOG numbers (healthier patients) and it would work better in 1st ln then in second line (The chemo harms your immune system and does a lot of cell damage).