InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

honestabe13

02/03/16 12:09 PM

#251637 RE: John R #251636

i thought it was relatively low risk when i bought more at Dart's 1.08 level.

wrong AGAIN
icon url

Protector

02/03/16 12:34 PM

#251655 RE: John R #251636

John R, in an isolated world were PPHM would have been the only stock on Earth your assessment might have made sense.

Throwing it on the table in the middle of global and international market correction, were biotech in special, helped by pre-election statements of Hilary, is under heavy stress, does not make sense.


To better understand why your statement makes no sense look at this Biotech Index $BTK graph.

Since DEC 2015, the index lost 25%. Now unless you claim it is PPHM's fault I think it is otherwise clear.
icon url

Couch

02/03/16 12:45 PM

#251663 RE: John R #251636

LMAO; oh I get it. Taking those huge risks off the table for such a small biotech is a bad thing. Yeah that's the ticket.
icon url

sunstar

02/03/16 2:49 PM

#251698 RE: John R #251636

Gas is cheap. So it must be contaminated.

Great analysis BUT with all the risk in part 1 taken off the table we still have an .87 stock.



That's one point of view. It may be short sited.

IMO

sunstar