Bitspirit, this is not entirely true.
The idea that the CTI contract is still valid it is in contrast with the legal procedure that has terminated the agreement. This procedure has followed the rules, and may be discussed in court, but until evidence to the contrary it is a legitimate legal pathway.
This means that a GSA contract in the position of dubious legality of CTI can open the door to further lawsuits against the company.
In this case a lawsuit against CTI would be advantageous because CTI would have the economic resources to meet the likely demands for compensation. In any case, another important lawsuit against the company definitely creates more problems than it can solve a GSA contract.
So, CTI even with the GSA can survive without issues only if can restore a clear legal situation.
Obviously it is to exclude any new agreement with the inventor, especially after CTI continues to try to discredit and defame him by any means.
Speaking of defamation and similar activities, I noticed that VC remains the source of inspiration of CTI in order to continue its work, but has retired. Maybe the next retired is some VC follower that believes he can remain anonymous forever
In conclusione currently the only pathway possible to avoid the exposure of CTI in other lawsuits seems a new distribution contract with DIS&L finalized to military supplies... but it is quite unlikely or impossible that this can happen.
In all other cases the risk of bankruptcy for CTI remains unchanged for the high degree of exposure to various types of lawsuits.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
