Yeah - I saw it too but wasn't planning on bringing it up at the beginning of the weekend.
It looked to me like the primary prior art (Schumm) which was referenced was from 1992. And everyone was concerned about Panasonic/Matsushita!
There was a requested correction to remove some redundant references to "plurality" or similar. However, the overall summary read pretty harsh to me . . .
Hopefully, we will have a positive development in Asia soon - as alluded to in the recent earnings conference call - which will put a focus on the company's plans moving forward.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
