Replies to post #150762 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[Kmeister]

"IMO Scott should have done an RS in 2014. It would be almost forgotten by now and you might actually have got back to even by now with the proper story in place."

Disagree. The lack of a story ie. accomplishments is why we are where we are. An RS with no story would have been death. You yourself stated that the OS is not excessive here. The problem is the story, not the OS. Scott cant accomplish anything. Screwing with the share structure is what CEOs do when they cant succeed the real way. That is how you run a "stinky pinky". This company is not one, nor is it run like one. It is however run like a personal ATM. THAT is the problem.

[webpence]

At this point, I would be happy if you wanted to run the show, as I'm disgusted at the thought that $35k stands in the way of a resource calculation that is to NI standards.

[Newbie_Niobium]

Dan insisted that since there were no regulators to enforce SEC rules that the insiders did not need to divulge that info.
He was right. But my arguement was that for a company to be legitimate they need to follow the rules even when they are not enforced.

Most accurate item you have posted. Rules are in place to force people to take the correct actions. Strong company's operate with stricter internal policy's then the rules that are written.

IMO

[Newbie_Niobium]

Dan insisted that since there were no regulators to enforce SEC rules that the insiders did not need to divulge that info.
He was right. But my arguement was that for a company to be legitimate they need to follow the rules even when they are not enforced.

Most accurate item you have posted. Rules are in place to force people to take the correct actions. Strong company's operate with stricter internal policy's then the rules that are written.

IMO