So growth is bad? These guys are some of the most conservative financial managers I have seen. You think they are just adding staff for fun? If they didnt see more growth on the horizon they wouldnt be doing it. Revenues are going in the right direction and they are anticipating more growth. Wouldnt expect to not see losses at this stage and if things really take off they are going to need a lot more money to expand which means more losses and some sort of fund raising (exercise shelf probably). But this is good and eventually revenues will grow to cover.
I am well aware SIGMA is not profitable yet. And I am also well aware Marks burn rate for a start up has been well contained. I saw your 7-11 perspective and might add to that even though SIGMA's current quarterly Revs may only be a 3rd of the corner 7-11s annual Revs SIGMA has the potential to exceed the Revs of all 7-11s combined with time. For as much as 7-11 is convenient, SIGMA may prove to be essential to the additive industries world wide not only in the factories but on the corner and in your very home. $$$$SGLB$$$$
After reviewing Qtr. 1,2,3 of 2015 I realized Qtr.3 of 2015 saw the payroll more than double from the 1st and 2nd Qtr. As well as a rather substantial increase in stock comp. Appears there was substantial hiring done in Qtr.3. Quote: Mark conveniently forgot to mention what the net loss was for Q-4 but it almost certainly increased due to the addition of new staff in the quarter.------------------------------- Qtr.3 may have already covered that 4th Qtr certainty. I also noted a doubling of R&D cost in the 3rd Qtr. Not sure if that was due to contour or if analytics is taking a huge step forward. Things may be growing immensely greener than you believe them to be. I may seem overly optimistic but with good reason my money is where my mouth is and has been for over 3 years. My core position has never been larger and still growing. $$$$SGLB$$$$
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
