InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

frogdreaming

07/12/06 11:49 AM

#48250 RE: Virgil Hilts #48249

Virgil,

Stop snivelling and trying to weazel out from under your own words.

You countered and put the words "could not meet" into my mouth. I'm not going to play that game.

Then please supply us an explanation of the following quote that does not in any way suggest that DNAG can meet a milestone that the original licensee "could not meet".

Couldn't the terms of license have had milestones that were not met by the licensee, thus requiring them to return it? Oh wait, that would be implying that DNAPrint is capable of something that the original licensee is not.

Answer that and we can move on to the next part of the questions regarding the actual worth of a returned license.

regards,
frog
icon url

bag8ger

07/12/06 12:59 PM

#48256 RE: Virgil Hilts #48249

VirgilHilts,

I don't think the EPO was ever licensed before. I find no mention of it anywhere, except here.