Replies to post #96067 on EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

[Stock_Barber]

"This whole thing is really about the 'unity requirement'."

Not true!

The unity requirement is only box IV. That would only require filing of multiple patents to get around. Amusingly... the company made this out to be a GOOD thing at the time! Remember?

Box V is the problem. See pages 4-6! They find that there is both prior art and lack of an inventive step!

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/docservicepdf_pct/id00000030820326/WOSA/WO2015148735.pdf

This is the Sensimed patent that is the problem for prior art:

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2013050073&recNum=225&docAn=EP2011067408&queryString=rfid&maxRec=20213

It is safe to assume COO was fully aware of this...