InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

401kobessive

01/16/16 1:26 PM

#326400 RE: navycmdr #326399

If that's the case...I guess it was a loan.
icon url

mike_usa

01/16/16 1:29 PM

#326401 RE: navycmdr #326399

Ok Commander it's giving me some hope. But let's see what's the final outcome would be here. Thanks for your post.
icon url

401kobessive

01/16/16 1:34 PM

#326402 RE: navycmdr #326399

What really puts ice in my veins...my tax money is being used to attack my investment.
icon url

955

01/16/16 3:02 PM

#326409 RE: navycmdr #326399

Except that the Treasury is not classifying this as a loan, "but an investment on which taxpayers are now being compensated."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119888283


I share in former Judge Steele's excitement in making a legal argument in this case.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119885500




warrants/stock have ALREADY been RULED ILLEGAL

by JUDGE in AIG case ... when taken "in addition"

to Loan + Interest ... difference being the GOVT

hasn't already SOLD the STOCK in our case ...





icon url

Donotunderstand

01/17/16 12:04 PM

#326478 RE: navycmdr #326399

I agree but that case did not have a special law which is directly applicable to initial actions

As I understand it HERA made the actions of the GOV - the initial ones - legal under that law

AIG a very imperfect comparison as a result of HERA