InvestorsHub Logo

gailyj

01/13/16 3:19 PM

#227003 RE: gailyj #227001

Correction....

"Absolutely Positively No Reverse Split" Representation.

iSmellCrickets

01/13/16 3:20 PM

#227005 RE: gailyj #227001

Is it possible to move the discussion forward

Shareholders are aware, Mr.Miller stated no RS, I'm over it myself. I would hope other shareholders could get past that concern, and move to what is next for the company.

I intend no disrespect, in fact I appreciate the tenacity on the subject. However it's old news now. Driving it home at this point has no and will have no further effect.

Shareholders that care should be focusing on as i stated, what's next for ERBB, and the closest thing to 'what is next' at this point in time, is the next filings, what is within, and how did ERBB get past being forced an RS in order to stay liquid. I would think anyway.