InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

srm4u

01/12/16 6:34 PM

#7795 RE: jugs #7793

yes, thats a good possibility....won't no for sure unless shareholders attend the meeting

In connection with this order, the Company may not disparage the convertible lenders, or to take actions that could be perceived as disparaging to the convertible lenders or to otherwise take actions discouraging or that could be perceived as discouraging its stockholders from voting in favor of any share increase or other action required by the terms of the convertible notes or the court's order.
Thus, in preparing this Proxy Statement, the Company is seeking to comply with the court's order.


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119790500
icon url

watcher01

01/12/16 6:36 PM

#7796 RE: jugs #7793

Weren't we only supposed to give out like 15M shares to potentially all 3 lending companies??? Where the hell does 10 billion come into play??
icon url

PatriotFan

01/12/16 6:38 PM

#7797 RE: jugs #7793

Liquidation,of what? Why can't these people come to a out of Court agreement. This is rediculous. I don't blame Hermann. He thought the Courts would side with him. Jaspers, former CEO, are to blame. Have any of these people actually thought about GROWING a business.