InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

corporalagarn

01/06/16 9:33 AM

#247820 RE: cheynew #247816

I agree with you, but the market won't. It never does. Ten years and counting for me. Doubled my position over the past six months. Hopefully 2016 will be PPHM's year. Tenth year in a row I've heard that.
icon url

InternetForumUser

01/06/16 9:44 AM

#247823 RE: cheynew #247816

With all of the past stellar clinical trial data why would there be a need to build up scientific credibility? Isn't PS a cornerstone molecule that everyone is aware of? How about the P3 data being better than what was PR'd because management was sandbagging?

Is it scientific credibility or a lack of Peregrine Management Credibility?

icon url

ArchieK

01/06/16 9:52 AM

#247825 RE: cheynew #247816

Smart and important people, labs, companies...have more opportunity to engage in things than they have capacity. So when a top notch person, lab, company takes you in to their portfolio it's after some level of due diligence and a feeling that THEY could benefit from the association as well. $2mil is not a lot of money in the sphere of spending that is represented by that collaboration. I think it is simply the admission price, nothing more or less. I'd rather see them spend $2mil on THAT than ads, PR, IR etc. There will be hay made from this investment in the form of credibility, exposure, and data. IMHO.