InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dadd

07/10/06 3:28 PM

#64653 RE: Julius Erving #64652

OT: Julius, You made your comment known before, no sense in restating it over and over. Mark shares what he is told. Many agree, and many disagree with what he shares. Now, a word of advice to you. If you do not like reading his posts, why not put him on ignore and avoid the problem entirely? This board will not tolerate posters attacking posters. A very high percent of the readers/posters agree with that. Enough is enough.
Dadd

The thing I hate about an argument is that it always interrupts a discussion.
Gilbert Chesterton
(1874-1936)
icon url

maestro224

07/10/06 5:07 PM

#64660 RE: Julius Erving #64652

Even information from a questionable source is better than no information at all. If that lame news release was WB's idea of keeping people informed, he needs to go back to PR school and study long and hard. I can't believe all this quiet has anything to do with the investigation. You can do a PR about the company's activities without commenting on the investigation, if necessary. Where is news about the "road show this summer". Everyone can't still be on vacation. Where is the letter to shareholders promised in several emails by WB that was supposed to be out "soon". There are only two reasons I can think of for all this quiet. Gross incompetence or a deal in the works. Which is it?