Twinvest/Synchrovest, Another interesting feature of inverted AIM is in the arena of Synchrovest and Twinvest. With i-aim you just add money to the cash position. This will increase the buy and sell prices and on a dip you will buy a few more shares. When adding money next month the same happens etc. etc. Setting limit orders will automate this process. So regular increasing the money part of an i-aim machine means twinvest/synchrovest is not needed anymore to build a machine to the right size.
Also for irregular contributions you can just add money to the cash part of the i-aim machine. Maybe you have to buy some shares or maybe just enter a limit order and maybe next week you buy some more shares when the price is somewhat better.
Interesting point that i-aim consolidates all this functionality in one and the same machine(spreadsheet).
I must say that i found it difficult to adapt to i-aim thinking, but at this moment my perception has shifted more into the direction of i-aim, finding the btb formulas getting 'stranger'. This adaptation process is well handled by using the two methods in parallel spreadsheets together. Sometimes i have the feeling that Lichello actually wanted to invent i-aim.
Another feature of some interest is the sizing of the transactions in relation to the safe and min-txn parameters.
I-aim is symmetric in cash for buy and sell orders(using the same percentage for buying and selling) in the same way as aim-btb when using min-txn size based on PC in stead of stock value.
Each day i find new functionality. Could it be that a cash-centric view is more logical in a depression and a stock-centric view in times of high inflation? Although the interest on cash was quite high in the 70's, while now the interest on cash is maybe 1%.
Best, k
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
