sulaco, I fully agree because corner stone molecules is not something that grows on trees and is available in abundance.
If Bavituximab is a cornerstone molecule candidate for some BP then we are talking about a complete different dimension.
You know, a buyer always likes to evaluate your cost and then offer you something that he thinks is a good price plus good profit and some potential.
But you understand that they NEVER will from themselves include the fact that your, say, 15 years research results in something UNIQUE.
One can do 15 Years of research and end up with something of value but nothing like bavituximab. So the WHAT must be taken in account. And that is where BP doesn't like to go because they know potential is something THEY want to put in their pocket. They just want to cover your past cost, give you a risk bonus and a potential bonus ones they now your stuff works. That is CHEAP for them because they only buy the winners.
It is NOT going to work with PPHM. The complete company structure is set-up for this not to happen, starting with King being Co-patent holders, the poison pill, a closed BoD guarding the poison pill (guarding=making sure the PP is activated when the conditions allowing to do so are met) and currently we have no more external financial pressure that could force us into accepting certain deals (such as bankers and venture capitalist that only see leverage over time and couldn't care less about the passed effort), potential etc because that brings them nothing and if they want that they simply reinvest in the acquiring party.