Replies to post #64795 on Baltia Air Lines Inc. (fka BLTA)

[JohnnyDrama12]

If I may point out.

The time stamps are different in both of your posts about the e-mails you claim to have received. It gives the impression that they were doctored and still inconclusive whether they are real or not.

[ihubmoney]

Monroe1: I seriously find your post very Skeptical but yet very humor because both your posts the emails are "DIFFERENT, The Time Different" I guess Laura Brown has 2 emails. " [e-mail] and [e-mail]


[e-mail]
Nov 23 at 9:04 AM

To

[e-mail]

CC

[e-mail] [e-mail]

Message body

FAA Statement, please attribute to the FAA

November 23, 2015

YOUR OTHER POST:

[e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:03 AM
Subject: FW: Baltia Airlines

FAA Statement, please attribute to the FAA
November 23, 2015


Thanks for the laugh

[mrinvestor08]

Monroe I believe u.

And if baltia DID receive this letter from the FAA about a month ago...shame on baltia management for hiding the truth from us. We stick around for years...down 90% year over year...and we don't get the truth WHEN it is received. That's not loyalty to shareholders. We deserve better.

[taxguy]

That simple email is is more information than I have received in the last 7 years being invested (and of course it did not come from Baltia_.

IMO, Management has wasted so much time and money due to their unpreparedness and inexperience. Their complete lack of transparency and complete lack of communication (lying by omission) is truly reprehensible. They have yet to publicly acknowledge they have failed any of the tests, because they simply do not respond.

[emit]

''The Notice of Proposed Denial does not constitute a final order. Baltia has 30 days to reply to the FAA.''

We replied yesterday with a reply-meeting, two days prior to end 30 days... bet the local FAA personel was present.


R1 Coming Folks! or better.


imvho


emit...