Replies to post #38919 on Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[Profit]

I believe GE already has quality control in place just not quick and cost effective quality control. And SIGMA has now been operating under GE,s thumb ever since GE bought Morris there is no surprise here for GE. GE still has a lot of machines to buy to facilitate there production might be interesting to see if they come with SIGMA inside.

[DriftinWayOfLife]

Alan,

Would it not be reasonable to state that the JTDA with Morris Technologies and the secondary JTDA with GE and the AmericaMakes project which Mark referred to as being created by GE to demonstrate the technology (reference - the ER either before the most recent or the ER before that) are the PRE-TESTING? Hasn't this been ongoing for years? Hasn't GE put put out their own documents saying that Sigma Labs is a strategic Partner?

As regards my prior post (3916), it appears to me that being negative about not marketing a product BEFORE the need for the product exists is a somewhat confusing position to take - (independent of the GE JTDA connection for marketing to other OEMs - however, the projects with Aerojet Rocketdyne, Honeywell, Alcoa etc may speak to "marketing awareness" for those companies as well as "in general"). Does a claim of "not marketing" a product to a company that is strategically developing the product really make sense when that company has access to the product for research, development and testing but not for production purposes? Has it been your experience that GE is transparent here - I refer to the lack of news issued by GE about the printing of fuel nozzles? GE has made precious few announcements regarding their Auburn facility and the timeline for production. A company of GE's size can not really be considered to have to report as per SEC regs the printing preparation of a small component of the LEAP engine as that event is hardly "significant" to a company the size of GE.

patience and GLTA