InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

R33

12/07/15 8:25 AM

#482 RE: Alan Brochstein #481

Well said, Alan.
icon url

MonestHind

12/07/15 10:35 AM

#483 RE: Alan Brochstein #481

The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump.

IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme.

420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!

From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service.

That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on CannLabs insofar as its viability as an investment is concerned. After all, the 420Investor service's performance since inception is marked by a 75% LOSS overall...right?

Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
icon url

MonestHind

12/07/15 10:41 AM

#484 RE: Alan Brochstein #481

420Investor service = ~75% LOSS since inception?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't the 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" resulted in 75% LOSSES since inception?

~200 such "trade recommendations" and the vast majority have resulted in losses exceeding 20%?

How many CANL trades did that include?
icon url

MonestHind

12/07/15 10:48 AM

#485 RE: Alan Brochstein #481

What about the reviews like this one?

"Following the trade alerts almost wiped out my portfolio. [...] I did better on my own."



Was it a CANL trade that "wiped out" this guy's portfolio? Or was it the many horrible "recommendations" by 420Investor in general? Just curious.