InvestorsHub Logo

revenue_monster

12/04/15 12:45 PM

#244480 RE: Along4theRide #244479

Well if he's waiting till last month to drop the bomb that enrollment has not completed on time then he's an idiot. Simply not acceptable

JJ1223

12/04/15 3:27 PM

#244489 RE: Along4theRide #244479

Probably not but still hopeful. Some on here are conceding already that it's OK cause most Bio's fail to meet deadlines all the time. They claim we're different "holy grail", "Microsoft of bio" but when it suits say we're like everyone else.


Investing is a big boy game, and sometimes you need to put on "big boy" pants, and try not to ramble on about things that the company or other posters cannot control. I have not seen an excuse from Peregrine. The number 582 was set by the FDA in November of 2013, and the target date for completion was set for EOY 2015. It is not a DEADLINE because it would not make sense to stop any trial short of complete enrollment because of a predetermined date.. I am hopeful we complete in December, and we will get more flavor on the 10th. GLTA

Couch

12/04/15 3:57 PM

#244495 RE: Along4theRide #244479

And for some investing in PPHM it's not our first rideo and understand delays are par for the course with the FDA & other government agencies in general not just in the biotech sector. Next

tradero

12/05/15 3:19 AM

#244548 RE: Along4theRide #244479

A4R, when there is a "hockeystick" type enrollment such as PPHM said there would be, the number of enrolled patients during the final months should not be small ...

What I mean by that is that if enrollment is expected to happen by EOF, the number of patients enrolled in December could/should be relatively significant and therefore we need to wait for that time to elapse before being able to state that enrollment is complete

Yet, SK said it is going as planned and for me that is good news