I understand your point of view.
We (old shareholders) have built a huge amount of confidence since retructuring but there are still some points I would like the Company addressed.
But there are a few verifiable points as the joint patent filled by COO/EPGL, the confirmation from COO that there are/were working together.
Note as well that the people involved in EPGL are "visible" persons, not out of the blue persons.
Note as well PWC involvment.
Yes, as longs we tend to have pink-coloured glasses and be allergic to critics but I strongly believe we could have a good story here. And we should know within weeks/months...