Agree 100% ->The same point Franck is making. Not one denial of public statements. Not one. ---Independent Zacks analyst seems to believe in the company. ---Independent MEMs Journal seems to believe in the company. ---AJW Fund and PwC seem to believe in the company. ---CooperVision seems to believe in the company.
How much "independent confirmation" does one need to believe what is going on is "real"? "
Confirmation? Correct filing forms would be nice, for starters. Also that guys statement of "back pain device no longer part of the company" was misleading because their back pain thing is still on their website!!!
Doubledown22, the word "seems" is used a lot when describing EPGL;
I cannot subscribe to the theory that unless things are denied they have to be true. Where EPGL can prove everything real is in their financial statements and they do the opposite.