Replies to post #6050 on Zalemark Holding Co Inc (ZMRK)

[I-Glow]

ZMRK has been dark since 2009 - they would have to file at least 2 years of audited financials.

Then they would have to file either a S-1 or a Form 10. And it would have to pass comments from the SEC.

I have never seen a company that has been dark for 6 file a successful registration statement.

The financials they have been filing aren't GAAP compliant.

Hell, they tried to use shareholder equity as a asset in the past.

Posting that Zalemark will "uplist" is just wishful thinking without looking at the facts.

IG

[BrophInvest]

Agreed. Patience will be a virtue with ZMRK.

GLTA

$Go ZMRK

[fact-checker]

How can-you expect OTCQB without an ounce of-sales.
All your wishful thinking posts regarding audits and uplisting don't mean anything without sales. Zalemark continues to give away investors money on worthless licenses. A license only is an asset when you make significant profitable sales and revenue off that license. The license becomes a liability when you don't make sales but contine to have to pay minimum royalty payments.
Zalemark and Steven Zale must give up on the licensing of brands as it had never made them money in all the years they have been doing this.