InvestorsHub Logo

pitts77h

11/19/15 9:02 AM

#24108 RE: decouverte d Elbe #24107

Doesn't matter how many times BS is repeated, it's still BS.

The SEC order is clear:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2015/34-75183.pdf

the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors ... revoke the registration ... of the Respondents identified in Section II hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents.

Doesn't matter what Eddie does... SMYK, along with ANY SUCESSOR company, is dead.

Eddie consented to this, btw.

integral

11/19/15 12:52 PM

#24109 RE: decouverte d Elbe #24107

If Eddie is soliciting an offering, why is it not filed with the SEC? More securities violations? Eddie just does not care about following the rules, he just does it Fast Eddie's way. Which is why he got "Revoked".

integral

11/19/15 12:52 PM

#24110 RE: decouverte d Elbe #24107

If Eddie is soliciting an offering, why is it not filed with the SEC? More securities violations? Eddie just does not care about following the rules, he just does it Fast Eddie's way. Which is why he got "Revoked".

Since he just doesn't give chit, maybe next up is a C&D and a civil litigation.