The notice to the attorney (Drew) clearly states to, "RE-FILE Document 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment", ~and~ provides instruction that "supporting documents must be filed separately," which was done incorrectly the first time resulting in 9's termination...
Your statement that "They refilled the documents pursuant to the judges request on 11/17/15" is inaccurate, as the request was not to "re-file supporting documents"... but rather to RE-FILE 9, and when re-filing 9, that "supporting documents must be filed separately"...
Instead, Drew re-filed documents in support of 8... as a result, the next deadline is set to 10/11/16 which was the deadline set for 8, instead of the response deadline set in 9, which was 11/10/15...
"Doc. No. 8
Deadline/Hearing: Response Deadline
Event Filed: 10/27/2015
Due/Set: 10/11/2016"
Your statement that TBEV hasn't filed an answer with all the exclamations is simply deceiving, as it vehemently implies that they should have already replied, when they actually have until 10/11/16 to respond...
Anstalt and TBEV would both be better off if Anstalt's attorney could get their filings under control... do what they're told, and stop transposing month and day...
"***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Eliezer Drew to RE-FILE Document 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment . ERROR(S): Supporting documents must be filed separately, each receiving their own document number. Affirmation in Support of Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion are both found under the event list Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents. Rule 56.1 Statement is found under the event list Other Answers. (ldi) (Entered: 10/29/2015)"
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
