Not for future events or non public material information, but for reasons on why concerning past events, of course you can. You just choose not to. The disclosures have the answers to all of your questions. For instance, they pulled the safe off the market not once, but twice to make it better. Its all in the filings. We can only guess she committed to CVS, not because she is irresponsible, as you constantly imply, but she must have the resources in place to fulfill. I don't think any business person in their right mind would commit to such a program without knowing it can execute. But then again, it appears every one of your post tries to make her look irresponsible. Again, absurd and to what end.
I have a feeling the more you push, the better the reasons underlying her decisions. There are some things as shareholders we are entitled to know, and others not. I am supposing that the SEC would consider those reasons immaterial, or they would have been developed more in the disclosures.
Again, this is a forum for RXSF, not a fishing expedition or a shooting gallery. I am content with the disclosures. Why would YOU want more if you're not a shareholder as you claim, and have no intention of investing in this company.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
