Sounds like someone does not know the difference between facts and conjecture.
An example of a fact would be that DP filed for bankruptcy. The conjecture would be that this means he is somehow not qualified to be a CEO. This takes very little critical thinking skills but somehow it eludes some. The article does not say what the circumstances of the bankruptcy are. And who really cares? Donald Trump's business have filed for bankruptcy 4 times, yet they still run and he is still a billionaire who is running for President of the richest nation in the world.
Everything in the article is pure conjecture. Facts are facts, but the facts in the article do not prove wrongdoing. The article may be full of facts, but when statements of pure conjecture are made using those facts then the article in its entirety is essentially worthless.