and this is the exact example of mindless teapukers crap.
lieing for jesus,...what a way to live.
so why tell "details",...it might mean you have to actually
lets see,..some general stuff,...not details,...lets see,...he was some kind of some of some powerful entity,..not sure whom he had allegiance to,...and he was suppose to be some type of savior for lost souls and rumor says he died on a cross,...but he's someone people follow for his recipe for saving the soul,....
they might not be the exact details but kinda,...
did i just LIE ? my bad ? oops !!!
maybe, just maybe,....this country can rid itself of ignorance in exchange for intelligence.
Hi Arizona1, you seem to have trouble distinguishing between significant details and insignificant ones. And you seem to also have failed to consider that maybe his mom told a different version of the story or Parade magazine chose to publish a different version of the story. Let me know when you see something proving his mom's version of the story is the correct one. Not that it really matters cuz there's no question he got into a physical incident with his mom. Which was the main point he was trying to convey.
And you don't seem to care that the media has repeatedly published malicious lies (as opposed to unimportant incorrect details) about him.
Why is that ? Is "I think he's a liar therefore he must be a liar" all you and others need to make up your mind ? How do you feel about going from "There's no evidence of these events happening therefore he's delusional" to "Oh there are some details in question and therefore he must be lying." ?
How do you feel knowing the Detroit Free Press doesn't consider him delusional or a liar ?