I hope you fellow board watchers don't mind that I dredge some old postings here for possible action. Here's another one. I'll probably follow up with some more, if I can find them. Over the years we have had a marvelous group of Posters with very intelligent and informative information. It's a shame that we forget who and what was posted.
Post # 7131 11/29/2012
New Court papers filed
11/26/12 LA law firm of Engsrom,Lipscomb and Lack filed in US Court of Federal Claims (CFC) case No. 95-CV-oo39 Judge Block Presiding.
The Following:
Motion in Opposition of Summery Affirmance.
If you recall, LTWs took their case to the existing, ongoing (since 1995) CFC case to be included as Intervenors on behalf of the DIMEQ holders. Their original brief was rejected by Judge Block (rather harshly IMO), based on JPMC reply to their first request. This, extremely well written, response to JPMC is devastatingly clearly stated. If granted, this will give us DIMEQ holders a solid defense team that, I am sure, will well represent us before the Court.
PS. They want to by-pass the DE BK Court completely.
PPS If Sidedraft is still on board, would you kindly post the source to this Board (just as you have diligently done in the past), thanx
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
