InvestorsHub Logo

Blyster6554414

10/31/15 1:57 AM

#66472 RE: PaperLion #66470

I believe that in brokerages practicing selective allowance of the purchasing of shares at prices that the common retail investor is selectively disallowed from obtaining there is opportunity for certain hedge funds to profit from the highly selective service provision of the brokerage at the common retail investor's expense meanwhile providing an incentive for the company to dilute overall shareholder value in providing shares to the buyers that are selectively chosen to be serviced by the brokerages, at prices that are not serviced to common retail investors by the brokerages. If these brokerages would facilitate the same opportunity to common retail investors by allowing orders to be placed at the prices for which they selectively service there would at least be the possibility of a situation where a shorting hedge fund cannot virtually infinitely short a stock to the status of no bid while encouraging further dilution. The incentive for the brokerages to offer such selective service provision is that the brokerages can effectively cause most investors in particular stocks to fail to obtain profitability by providing favoritism in service provision to select clients. Meanwhile the company is encouraged to create massive dilution as a result of the market conditions being created by the brokerages approach to servicing clients. Downplaying the significance of this dynamic does more harm than good unless you consider preventing the profitability of most investors in particular stocks to be good. A brokerage allowing a short to cover at prices below 0.0001 meanwhile disallowing common retail investors from buying at those prices only serves to destroy the value of the investments of the common retail investor by encouraging dilution and a likely inevitable reverse split on the holdings that then become too expensive even at 0.0001. If brokerages would allow the common retail investor access to buy prices lower than 0.0001 then there is a possibility that the value of their investment could be preserved though the virtually inevitable reverse split caused by the brokerages favoritism in service provision to shorting hedge funds. The brokerages are controlling the outcome of many of these penny stocks by creating certain market conditions by way of their service provision particularly in companies that have no income other than selling shares. Brokerages are enjoying essentially forcing dilution by creating certain market conditions in companies that will predictably need to sell shares meanwhile causing that company to cause its investors to fail to obtain profitability, all accomplished through legitimately unfair service provision in servicing orders at particularly low prices only for certain clients without affording the same service to the masses who cannot even attempt to buy at those prices never mind recieve service for such buy orders from their brokerages. The brokerages are responsible for the outcome of a heavily diluted penny stock that typically comes with an inevitable reverse split. Thank your brokerage for manipulating the stock market with unfair business practices.