it was grams X meters ... already had this conversation ... a typo error ... OLD NEWS !!!
LOL. It doesn't matter if it is grams times meters, or grams divided by meters. It is nonsense. It is made up. And it is grossly, and deliberately, misleading. Nobody in the industry (except USPR) measures the "potential" of drill core that way. It is not only misleading, but I would dearly love to see it in a SEC filing and then see USPR have to file an amendment after the SEC calls them on it.
Who in the heck at USPR came up with it, I wonder? Someone with just enough experience in the mineral exploration business to be make a fool of themselves?
I thought you were saying this company has turned a corner and is no longer the scammy company they were in the past? Not with crap like "grams/meter", that kind of made up nonsense is indicative of a group of amateurs mostly focused on promoting a stock, and certainly not mineral exploration professionals.
BTW, same comments apply to the 43-101 nonsense - a legit junior exploration trading on a US exchange would never claim a report was 43-101 compliant. Shows an embarrassing level of ignorance (or deception?) on the part of USPR management.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
