I find the explanation that any such discounted shares could be *permanently* restricted hard to swallow. I have never seen such an agreement before, and I have seen very many! Who would ever buy such shares?
To accept it, I would need more than just the statement alone. What is the source of the assertion that the restricted shares would be re-restricted indefinitely?
"were discounted they would still be restricted and as EPGL has said on numerous occasions, any deal like this, the shares would always be restricted and when the time came for them to be unrestricted, they would arrange for them to be rerestricted'
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
