Replies to post #42252 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[Jamis1]

Funny, they're using semantics to make their arguments, TVs versus monitors.

Nanoco claims that alternatives to cadmium based quantum dots “are readily available…”

This is incorrect. There is no alternative material on the market with the same color gamut and energy efficiency. In addition, there are no monitors on the market based on indium phosphide.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151005006815/en/QD-Vision-Corrects-Factually-Incorrect-Statements-Nanoco#.VhOxkBFVikp

Nanoco continues its efforts to have products using its indium-based quantum dot technology introduced into the EU display market, but there are none to date. In the first quarter of this year, Samsung introduced televisions based on indium phosphide in the European market.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151005006813/en/Philips-Cadmium-Selenide-Based-Quantum-Dot-Monitors-Represent#.VhOxSBFVikp

[Jamis1]

They also don't credit ASUS' notebook with Nanosys qdots as being a monitor. I personally would consider any PC laptop or notebook as a monitor, but that's just my two cents.

http://4k.com/laptop/a-review-of-the-asus-zenbook-15-6-worlds-first-4k-quantum-dot-touchscreen-display-laptop/

The Philips monitor is the first quantum dot based monitor in the market today. There is currently no monitor in the market using indium quantum dots. Televisions based on QD Vision’s quantum dot technology have been on the market since 2013.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151005006813/en/Philips-Cadmium-Selenide-Based-Quantum-Dot-Monitors-Represent#.VhOxSBFVikp

[Solar_Express]

Interesting they left QMC out and piled on Nanoco. Nice find

[TedJ]

I believe that this is the writeup that QDV is responding to.

http://www.nanocotechnologies.com/media/press-releases/legal-uncertainty-surrounds-use-cadmium-television-and-computer-displays-eu