InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BubbaInSC

10/02/15 3:10 PM

#65235 RE: HeedTheChief #65230

Separating Was Foolish

Mostly because VTCQ is a one trick pony. There is no more R&D being spent on VTCQ develop truly new products (IMO, propylene glycol free is not an innovation) or to create a smoking cessation program.

MCIG is not going to produce nicotine based juices.

Again, imo, Paul/MCIG/VTCQ needs to make VTCQ more attractive and try to take market share away from Big Tobacco.

Why wouldn't Paul want to take a stab at taking away a mere 0.5% of $35 BILLION dollar U.S. tobacco industry?

Just 1/2 of a percentage point would make VTCQ a more likely buyout candidate.

Paul/MCIG/VTCQ simply don't know how to position this company. That's sad.