InvestorsHub Logo

Spartak11

10/01/15 3:07 PM

#42147 RE: chessmite #42145

Thats interesting numbers.

Another interesting look is the 5 year charts for both companies. Thats where the SP difference is shocking.

Nano peaked at the beginning of 2012 around 186 p. They have since slid all the way down to where they are now. The 52 week high was in the 150s for them. Almost a drop of 65%. Their recent 16% gain is due to a rebound after it lost 27% the last two weeks.

Not sure whats causing their slow and steady year after year drop, but I am certainly glad we are all with QTMM.

QTMM hovered around .20s in 2011. From 2012 to mid 2014 QTMM was trading from .10 to .04. Then it had a crazy spike into the .40s. It quickly settled from there into the range we have seen the last year or so.

Since, 2012, we have seen QTMM up about 200%. NANO is down about 65%. Thats pretty substantial. I did set the parameters for those dates of course arbitrarily.

The crazy thing is that QTMM is up 200% since 2012 without any revenues, without a contract in place, and without much publicity. There is certainly substantial risk still, but the potential upside is amazing.

NANO has had revenue, partnerships, and public backing and they are down this much. I know the QD market is not fully developed yet, but its interesting that the SP has taken such a hit for them.

Just some interesting data....