Replies to post #41525 on Banro Corp. fka BAA

[StockItOut]

I get your point. But then why not simply say Q4?
After all, we're now at Q4.

We've already been (seemingly) misled regarding Q3.
Saying Q4 for the presentation would not mislead if indeed Namoya has become commercial in or by the end of Q3, as a listed Q4 ramp-up projection would still be appropriate (and correct). Any subsequent updated presentation document could well be established before and for the actual conference.

Yet, if Namoya is not yet commercial, as I expect, and with such frame of mind when I read the presentation, also as we are now in Q4, then the projected ramp-up "Mine and Plant Throughput Rate at Design Capacity Q3/Q4." listing is ambiguous in offering a general H2 time range.

Rather Banro stating just 'Q4' would be most appropriate.


We shall see, of course.