InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

X-Fortune 500

06/24/06 9:27 AM

#12591 RE: Clearwater1080 #12589

Darn we would be shut down, we would be a Vertical Monopoly

Tarctor used to plow the field to grow the corn to make ethonol to win the E-water 500. Guess we would have to make all the competators put SO-Be-IT and Yabba Dabba Java in their vehiculars.

I could buy a good set of bifocalnoculars to watch the race.


icon url

Jestiron

06/24/06 10:08 AM

#12593 RE: Clearwater1080 #12589

Hey Clear..someone on iHub put it to me good for hoping the best for e-water and not caring for the colas (although I posed a question asking why RSHN owns only e-waters and how it affects our PPS).

Someone responded, rather harshly if I recall, that the stock of this company will be reflected by the revenues of ALL of the products (even though RushNet has direct rights to e-Water).
It makes sense. If water does not sell a drop (serious hypothetical scenario, of course) and the colas kick arse providing serious company growth and revenue, then the RSHN stock will grow with it regardless of e-Water. The scenario works both ways; however, the BEST scenario would be serious sales for ALL products.

Thats how it was explained to me...and it does makes sense.

I still do not understand/grasp the benefits of saying that RUSHNET wholly owns e-Water at this point, but the future may provide some answers as to why this is.

Any of you financial masters care to chime in on this. Im always ready to toake my lumps as the price for learning something I was wrong about.

On a sidenote:
Does anyone else think that the Rush Cola and Ginseng Rush products are similar rnough to remove one? Its my perception and I'm sure the difference is there. Any info on this would be appreciated. Thanks!

Have a great weekend everyone!