InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mas

06/22/06 1:25 PM

#72878 RE: chipguy #72876

He must be talking about the new clustered multithreading part as he's not known for his exagerating hyperbole so K8L will probably have a year's life although knowing AMD the next part is probably built on it as the base ;-). So HT Nehalam vs anti-HT K8L++, should be more fun and fireworks in 2008 ;-).

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20060622014633.html

“We’re in the throes of finalizing the architecture we’re going to introduce next, and that’s going to be killer,” Mr. Ruiz added.





icon url

fastpathguru

06/22/06 1:44 PM

#72879 RE: chipguy #72876

Or maybe he's referring to chip-level architecture, vs. core architecture.

fpg
icon url

wbmw

06/22/06 3:43 PM

#72883 RE: chipguy #72876

Re: Either he is talking about K8L (and it's later than most here
expect) or else K8L will have a lifespan about the same as
long as Dempsey's.


Of course it's K8L. What else would it be? AMD crowed over K8L at their last analyst's conference talking about all the new features in it, and making it seem like it's right around the corner. But here's the catch: if AMD can't launch this sucker until 2008, they will have big problems between now and then, with only the G-step 65nm F-shrink to carry the torch.

In fact, thinking of it this way makes a lot more sense than previous rumors, which had 4 or 5 different cores lining up all at the same point. AMD may have increased their development teams, but not enough to have F-step, 90nm quad core, G-step dual core, G-step quad core, H-step dual core, H-step quad core, and mobile optimized parts of all these steppings to all come out within a year period.

The new schedule aligns with a yearly beat rate, with quad core specials sort of sprinkled out in between. F-step is AMD's 2006 CPU, followed by a 65nm G-step next year, followed by next-gen H-step Deerhound in 2008. Seems much more realistic.
icon url

chipdesigner

06/22/06 4:13 PM

#72885 RE: chipguy #72876

Xbit (and AMDZone) are using a bogus headline, I think.

Hector appears to have said "architecture", not "micro-architecture", and indeed, Direct Connect Architecture 2.0 is on their Tech Day roadmaps for 2008. The bit about "work well with our partners for the best performance" also strongly suggests he is not talking about the micro-architecture, but rather the new interconnect.

http://www.epscontest.com/presentations/06q2_analyst-day.htm?slide=66&a