No, what we want disclosed in the material events that every company including ERHC is required to disclose. Do you really think the issuance of each and every one of those convertible debentures was not material when each resulted in millions of additional shares of stock being issued? Do you really think the number of outstanding shares at any point is not material when 100's of million are being issued? Do think an insider like Chrome/SEO should flaunt the law and not disclosing their acquisition of stock which is required by law. Do you think secret companies should be formed without informing the shareholders of what they are going to be used for? Do you think the terms of the convertible debentures should be hidden from shareholders? Do you think the terms of a convertible debenture with an insider like Chrome should be hidden when disclosure is required? Do you think a company should disregard their own bylaws and not hold shareholders meetings and not allow votes on the BOD?
Frankly, I think we "get it" just fine. However I do believe some don't and for the life of me I can't figure out why anyone would overlook all of those things and pretend nothing can be done. Get it now?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
