She is ruling logically and in our favor as I read it
Things we wanted - our request to extend our discovery (I assume its always been jurisdictional discovery?) GRANTED
and
plaintiffs’ motion to stay briefing on defendant’s supplemental motion to dismiss (Docket #164) is GRANTED
and as I read it the judge then used the robe and cloak of continuing discovery to dodge some other questions pro and con for us
but as I read it
we get more documents and interviews and time to read and learn
GOV effort to get a supplemental motions to dismiss is STAYED - no such decision while discovery going on - (in essence while not denying out right - the STAY IMO confirms that the Judge does not at all or wholly accept the core argument of the GOV that would be the foundation for a dismissal (????????_
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
