InvestorsHub Logo

peregr

09/03/15 5:29 PM

#233466 RE: Protector #233463

The question of "So how do we think about the need for 175M more shares?" has to be one of the top 3 questions asked by the analysts. For their EPS guidance, they have to know the denominator. Especially if their firm is both buy/sell side.

BCS Paladin

09/03/15 6:22 PM

#233476 RE: Protector #233463

If we are lucky an analyst pops the right question next CC.



If it is a RIGHT question from the perspective of Mgt, then you'll get their canned answer.

If it is a crappy question from the perspective of Mgt, then you will get a canned crap answer.

Do you really think this is a democracy???

Grow up and VOTE YES ON 3

epcjmc

09/03/15 6:53 PM

#233482 RE: Protector #233463

September 9, 2015 conference call. I hope we have some more information. I am on the fence waiting until the last possible to vote my shares.

nuke661

09/03/15 10:22 PM

#233504 RE: Protector #233463

CP,

I'm laying on my son's couch typing on cell phone which I hate doing; it takes so long. However I don't want you to think I'm ignoring you and being rude. You're probably already in bed anyway. I guess my position would have been better described as I INTEND to vote yes and the company will have to say something in the cc that causes me to change my mind or news comes out that also might change my position before I actually receive my voting instructions from my brokers. I still don't see how #3 passes with the history of broker non votes we've had.

bidrite

09/04/15 7:58 AM

#233531 RE: Protector #233463

If we are lucky an analyst pops the right question next CC.



This would not be good enough to sway me to a yes vote. Anything can be said during a Q & A session that never come to fruition. Such a massive increase in OS should require something in writing.