Not sure how a quote from Dr. Garnick is a reply to my post. The points remain: 1. PPHM has enough cash currently plus the $50 million recent ATM filing to bring Sunrise results to fruition. 2. IF PPHM proves shareholder value creation, a vote LATER for yes can be done for a small fee.
Dr. Garnick has valuable experience for PPHM, no doubt. But that and abusive dilution (past and possibly future) are two completely different topics.